Post by juthi52943 on Jan 4, 2024 5:50:37 GMT 2
In order to minimize the risk of further thefts and protect against financial losses, the administrator comes up with the idea of sending to these stores photos showing images of people committing thefts, recorded using video monitoring. The photos could be distributed, for example, among store management and security staff. Thanks to this, they would be able to identify the person committing the theft if he appeared on the premises of the delicatessen.
Two questions arise here will such an action violate Job Function Email List the provisions of the GDPR and what are the grounds for processing the image of a natural person suspected of theft? The ICO , the British supervisory authority, recently considered the issue of the admissibility of sharing the image of people committing theft . the use of tools that provide access to video surveillance records should be limited only to exceptional situations when the need taking into account the legitimate interest of the controller gives rise to such data sharing.
He also pointed out that the group of people to whom the image will be transferred should be limited. These can only be people directly involved in preventing a crime ( store management or security staff) or in detecting such a crime (in this case, the police). In turn, making the image available to a wider group of people, including publishing it on a social media platform related to a given entrepreneurs activity, will no longer be justified, according to the ICO. IOD function - this is conveyed well When is sharing an image acceptable? The ICO indicated cases when sharing an image is permissible.
Two questions arise here will such an action violate Job Function Email List the provisions of the GDPR and what are the grounds for processing the image of a natural person suspected of theft? The ICO , the British supervisory authority, recently considered the issue of the admissibility of sharing the image of people committing theft . the use of tools that provide access to video surveillance records should be limited only to exceptional situations when the need taking into account the legitimate interest of the controller gives rise to such data sharing.
He also pointed out that the group of people to whom the image will be transferred should be limited. These can only be people directly involved in preventing a crime ( store management or security staff) or in detecting such a crime (in this case, the police). In turn, making the image available to a wider group of people, including publishing it on a social media platform related to a given entrepreneurs activity, will no longer be justified, according to the ICO. IOD function - this is conveyed well When is sharing an image acceptable? The ICO indicated cases when sharing an image is permissible.